uncoveringsound_logo

Difference between chamber and orchestral music: 7 factors to consider

difference between chamber and orchestral music
Mario Friscia

Mario Friscia

Table of Contents

What’s the difference between chamber and orchestral music?

There are at least 7 factors that determine the difference between chamber and orchestral music: the number and type of instruments, concert venues, the role of conductor, genre, duration and performance context.

The purpose of this article is to go through each of these factors and clarify the origin of these two different types of music, by giving you a series of examples of chamber and orchestral pieces.

Before diving into the topic, I think it may be useful to provide you with a brief explanation of what we usually mean by chamber and orchestral music.

Let’s get started!

 

Chamber and orchestral music: a definition

With the expression chamber music, people usually refer to a broad category of classical compositions and musical events performed within European noble households starting from the seventeenth century.

This genre of music was based on the melodies produced by a small group of instrumentalists and was composed with one main goal:

to entertain and delight the rich patron who had sponsored the creation of these chamber works and organized their actual performance by hosting the concerts within his or her own palace.

Orchestral music is another generic term, pretty vague I admit, referring to all the large scale musical productions that employed sections of different instruments and took place in theatres and concert halls from the Baroque era to the present day.

Now that you have an idea of what these two terms mean, we can move on and explain in greater detail how chamber music differs from orchestral music.

Let’s start by examining the number and type of instruments that are included in a chamber music piece and in an orchestral composition respectively.

 

Number of performers and type of musical instruments

performers and instruments in chamber and orchestral music

The first difference between chamber and orchestral music can be found in the amount of performers that take part in the musical event.

A piece of chamber music generally employs a small and variable body of performers, ranging from two up to ten or twelve, while an orchestral composition usually exceeds this number and can involve even more than one hundred instrumentalists.

Another frequent difference is that while chamber music assigns each single part of the score to one specific kind of musical instrument, an orchestral music is characterized by having the same part played by a section of instruments.

This difference in size also means that an orchestral piece of music offers the audience the opportunity to experience a wider spectrum of instruments, timbres and sonic dynamics, compared to the smaller ensembles used in chamber music.

Having a larger arsenal of sounds at one’s disposal is one of the factors that makes orchestral music the most meaningful test bench for a composer, in the sense that it shows his capacity to manage, organize and exalt the sonic peculiarities of each family of instruments.

However, commenting on the unique role played by instruments in a chamber orchestra, Goethe once said that “it was like listening to a conversation between people“, an intimate dialogue between good friends.

I totally agree with Goethe and add that depending on the composer’s personality and style, that peaceful and balanced conversation can become a fierce fight between opposing forces, themes and rhythms.

The fact that we have a small group of instruments communicating with each other is crucial in giving to a chamber music performance that sense of informal intimacy or direct confrontation.

In addition, it is also interesting to note that the sonic identity of each instrument can be better displayed by the composer in a chamber setting, compared to what happens within an orchestral music, where the acoustic competition among the instruments gets tougher due to the high number of performers contained in each section.

Another difference worthy of being mentioned is that chamber music gives the audience the opportunity to get closer to the interaction between the players and, as a result, to follow more easily and appreciate the musical details and all those subtle interpretative nuances enacted by the instrumentalists during the live performance.

 

Concert venues

concert venues in chamber and orchestral music

The second important difference between chamber and orchestral music is that while chamber music was born to be played in palace chambers, private homes and churches, orchestral music was performed within theatres and large concert halls specifically built for this purpose.

Obviously, writing a composition for a small space required a smaller musical force compared to what happens when scoring an orchestral piece like a symphony, a concerto or an opera.

This is why pieces of chamber music counted less performers and types of instruments compared to orchestral compositions.

As a result, the reduction in the number of players and the smaller size of the concert venue contributed to create an atmosphere where every single musician could effectively converse with his companions and the audience could intimately join the performers along their musical journey.

Nowadays, new concert venues have started to host chamber music events and it’s no surprise to see some ensembles performing in cafè, restaurants, bookshops and wedding parties, all locations quite far from the luxurious and exclusive nobiliary buildings of the origins.

 

The role of conductor

conductor in chamber and orchestral music

Another important element that helps us distinguish between chamber music and orchestral music is the presence or absence of a conductor.

Have you ever noticed that a Baroque sonata, a string quartet or a piano trio play on stage without a conductor?

The absence of a separate figure entitled to supervise the whole performance gives to the musicians involved in chamber music a unique sense of autonomy and interpretative freedom.

Each of them has much more control over every single element of the performance, be it the speed, volume or timbre.

Especially in the sphere of interpretation, all the members of a chamber music orchestra participate much more in giving their own shape to the composition.

The audience feels this unique creative effort, where each performer gets involved intensively in the arrangement process.

The fact that an organized flow of sounds can originate without someone leading the orchestra is one of the elements that makes chamber music so special and different from orchestral music.

Moving to orchestral music, given the large amount of musicians involved in the performance, it is absolutely necessary to have a leading figure in charge of watching over the live performance and taking all the major interpretative decisions regarding, for example, tempo, volume and timbric nuances.

 

Genre, formal structure and duration

genres of music

As you might expect, chamber music differs from orchestral music also in terms of genres.

From Corelli, Scarlatti and Bach to Haydn, passing through Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert, including Smetana, Debussy and Ravel, all the greatest classical authors have published works belonging both to chamber and orchestral music.

The most appreciated genres of chamber music were the following:

madrigal, cantata da camera, sonata da camera and sonata da chiesa and string quartet.

Equally popular were piano trios and quintets.

I’ll share with you some examples of these genres in the final section of this article.

Moving to orchestral music, starting from the Baroque period we find the rise of other genres specifically tied to a larger number of performers such as symphony, concerto, opera and many others.

As regards the overall formal structure, chamber and orchestral music did not differ very much, considering that they shared the same internal articulation:

a collection of 3/4 independent pieces called movements.

This structure appears in the first sonatas, quartets and piano trio-s and gets transferred to the later orchestral genres, such as concerto and symphony.

Before ending this chapter, it is important to highlight that chamber music differed from orchestral music also in terms of duration.

Chamber pieces were used to last around 15 to 30 minutes, while orchestral works could reach a duration of one hour or more.

 

Performance contexts

performing contexts

Historically, what distinguished chamber music from orchestral music was also the social context in which a given composition was performed and the kind of audience that attended the concert.

The first works of chamber music were written and performed to meet a specific need:

to satisfy the musical thirst of a small minority of wealthy aristocrats and enhance the halo of prestige surrounding their parties and social gatherings.

The advent of Romanticism marked a gradual but clear fracture with this perspective.

With the inexorable decline of the aristocratic world, European composers started to score their symphonies, concerts and operas to conquer the attention of a larger middle-class audience by infusing these works with their own personality, talent and creativity.

Instead of a royal palace chamber, now it’s the public concert hall to host the most important musical events; instead of a noble patron, composers try to get the attention of managers and theatre directors.

As a result, the audience itself underwent a radical transformation:

from a small number of distracted noblemen and members of a royal family to an mixed group of music enthusiasts, that paid a ticket to attend a specific musical event, with the expectation of being not only entertained but also thrilled, surprised, moved and excited.

It turned out that the wide expressive possibilities offered by orchestral music were perceived as the best way to meet the musical needs of this new kind of audience, so inclined to a more focused approach to the listening process.

This tendency of preferring orchestral music over chamber music is still alive in today’s international musical scene.

Just take a look at the calendar of events published by all the main musical institutions and theatres and you’ll see how different is the space devoted to chamber music in comparison to orchestral music.

Now it’s time to feel the difference between chamber and orchestral music by exploring some of the most representative genres.

 

Examples of chamber music

Among the first examples of chamber music we find a type of vocal composition with instrumental accompaniment called cantata da camera, literally “chamber cantata”, which was created to be sung in a domestic space located in a palace, castle or court.

As a result, the consumption and appreciation of this kind of music were originally reserved to a small group of wealthy individuals belonging to European aristocracy and royal families.

Let me share with you an example of “chamber cantata” by Alessandro Scarlatti (1660-1725) in which you can hear the balanced combination of vocals with the basso continuo, developed by three instruments: harpsichord, cello and theorbo:

 

 

In terms of pure instrumental music, the seventeenth century saw the rise of a genre called sonata da camera.

By sonata da camera we mean a piece of chamber music written for a small ensemble of instruments, generally a trio, formed by 2 violins and basso continuo.

While a sonata da camera was performed in private households, a similar genre, named sonata da chiesa, had churches as its primary performance space.

It was another Italian composer, Arcangelo Corelli, to contribute to the popularity of this genre of chamber music by composing both sonata da camera and sonata da chiesa.

Here is an example of sonata da camera where the main melodies are assigned to two violins, while the basso continuo is built through the joint effort of the harpsichord and a viola da gamba:

 

 

Moving from Italy to France, we find the chamber music written by a series of composers for the royal chamber orchestra of Luigi XIV.

As you go through the different pieces played in this video, notice how the number of performers employed in these chamber compositions increases with respect to the previous examples of Scarlatti and Corelli:

 

 

The fact that the body of musicians playing together for the French King expands in such a significative way is due to a clear plan:

creating a musical experience and a sound architecture that could mirror the power and magnificence of the royal family.

The eighteenth century’s chamber works are marked by the creative personality of Joseph Haydn, who is considered as the father of the string quartet.

He had the merit of turning what used to be viewed as mere background music into a refined and well-studied art form, designed to combine the entertainment needs of aristocracy with the research of a musical language that could exalt the quality of the various instruments.

Haydn is renown for its conversational style of playing, a unique and well-balanced way of writing music where each of the four instruments included in the quartet had its own role in building up the piece, similarly to what happens during a collective discussion involving a group of people.

Among the numerous Haydn’s string quartets, I’ve chosen the String Quartet in D Major, Op. 64 No. 5 (The Lark), performed by the Jerusalem Quartet:

 

 

Before taking into consideration some examples of orchestral music, I would like to conclude this section by giving you an example of piano quintet, another genre of chamber music particularly appreciated from the Romantic era onwards.

One of the most famous piano quintets is undoubtedly Shubert’s Piano Quintet in A major, D. 667, also known as The Trout Quintet.

As you listen to this elegant performance by The Schubert Ensemble, notice how the traditional string quartet line-up, made of 2 violins, a viola and a cello, is replaced by another setting, consisting of 1 violin, 1 viola, 1 cello and 1 double-bass:

 

 

Examples of orchestral music

By orchestral music we mean all those compositions written for big symphony orchestras.

One example of orchestral music that will immediately help you feel the difference with the pieces of chamber music mentioned above is Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony in D minor, a work premiered in Vienna in 1824.

Among the various performances available on Youtube I’ve chosen the version played by West-Eastern Divan Orchestra and conducted by Daniel Barenboim at the Berlin Philharmonic.

As you can hear, the composition involves a huge number of instrumentalists and is enriched by a choir with four soloists: soprano, mezzo soprano, tenor and bass.

Compared to an ordinary chamber music composition, this symphony, divided into 4 movements, lasts much longer, around 65 minutes and requires a concert hall specifically designed to host and enhance this kind of performances.

Have a listen:

 

 

Another majestic work that can be cited to highlight the main differences between chamber and orchestral music is Mahler’s Eight Symphony, also known as “Symphony of a Thousand”.

Its first performance took place in 1910 and amazed everyone in the audience for the large-scale vocal and instrumental forces employed by the composer, as you can easily verify by watching the video below:

 

 

It is evident how Mahler surpasses Beethoven when it comes to the number of performers used in the symphony.

Our quick overview of orchestral music would be incomplete if we didn’t spend some words about the role of instruments within opera.

During the Renaissance and Baroque periods, composers started to employ different sections of instruments to create the right atmosphere for staging their mythological stories.

One of the first Italian opera composers to specify the number and typology of instruments to be played in an opera was Claudio Monteverdi.

Here you can listen to his Orpheus and get a better sense of the typology and amount of musicians (41) involved in the performance:

 

 

I want to conclude this article with one last example of orchestral music coming from Richard Wagner, a revolutionary German composer who took the decision of hiding the orchestra from the audience’ view by placing the musicians within a “mystic gulf”.

To achieve this goal, he ordered the construction of a concert venue specifically designed to perform his Opera-s, called Bayreuth Festival House.

This brief documentary shows the actual disposition of Wagner’s orchestra and explains the acoustic and philosophical reasons that lie behind the creation of Bayreuth Festival House:

 

 

If the birth of chamber music revolved around the idea of creating a shared and intimate domestic space where the audience could follow closely and appreciate every interpretative gesture enacted by the musicians, Wagner turns the orchestra into a pure, mysterious and ethereal source of background sound, designed to accompany the opera singers without distracting the audience with the physical presence of the instrumentalists.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on email
mario_friscia_photo

Mario Friscia

Anthropologist of sound
music teacher

“Open your doorway to music cultures and listen to the world with gentler ears”

What topic are you interested in?

Related articles